Posts Tagged ‘printing money’

Wkly Rcp & Outlook – 07.27.12

Friday, July 27th, 2012

Tower Private Advisors

Short one this week…

Capital Markets

 

 

 Equity markets rallied sharply from this week’s lows, and they’ve sustained the rally for two days. If I’m not mistaken, it also breaks a series of Friday declines. The reason for the rally is a general swing to optimism by investors on the comments of one man, European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi, who said–during our waking hours the morning of July 26th–that…

Within our mandate, the ECB is ready to do whatever it takes to preserve the euro. And believe me, it will be enough.

Those are pretty strong words, and the market took part of them at their face value. Unfortunately, the markets neglected two key things.

  1. The ECB and other figures in Europe have been long on talk; short on doing. So, while the ECB may stand ready to “do,” it has yet to.
  2. The phrase ”within our mandate” eliminates a few things. For example, “within its mandate,” the ECB cannot buy unlimited quantities of sovereign debt like our Federal Reserve can. The ECB can, however, provide unlimited liquidity to a bank. That’s a key allowance, in that the European Stability Mechanism, the ESM, is said to be the salvation for the European crisis. Indeed, our BCA Research service includes this as one of the final steps to–once and for all–ending the crisis, if not the underlying problem of not enough growth in over-leveraged, uncompetitive countries. There’s just one problem: the ESM isn’t a bank yet.

A couple of things belie the rally of the last two days. From the table above, one can see that Emerging Markets were down on the week, while they would be big beneficiaries of a healing of the Europe problem. Second, I did not confirm this, myself, but I had heard that sovereign bonds had not responded with as much vigor as the [what seem to me to be just oversold] stocks.

Gold responded as strongly as any of the major (i.e. non-country) equity indexes above, and that suggests that the notion of quantitative easing (in the U.S.) and the ESM becoming a bank (in the end, money printing, aka quantitative easing) are getting some traction.

Oh, and wouldn’t you think that an open-ended, final-answer promise to “save the Euro,” would have prompted a rally in…uh…the Euro?

This Week

Eight economic releases stood out this week. In chronological order…

  1. Richmond Fed Manufacturing Index – plummeted; went from -3 to -17
  2. House Price Index – better than expected; equal to prior figure
  3. New Home Sales – worse than expected; worse than the prior figure
  4. Capital Goods Orders – double what was expected; triple the prior figure
  5. Initial Jobless Claims – back to the lowest level of the last five years
  6. Pending Home Sales – fell sharply; worse than expected
  7. Second Quarter GDP – dropped from 1.9% Q1 pace to 1.5%; better than the 1.4% expected
  8. University of Michigan Consumer Confidence – virtually unchanged from prior figure

So the tally is four worse than before; two unchanged; two better than the prior release. Versus expectations, it was almost a flip-flop, where five were better than expected; just three were worse than expected.

It’s the comparison against expectations that allowed the Citigroup Economic Surprise index to turn up, and the stock market with it, as is on display below.

The whole money game is about expectations–from earnings estimates to economic forecasts. Those guesses about the future get priced into securities and markets, while actual results either surpass, meet,  or fall short of the estimates, leaving markets to recalibrate their assessments of securities, markets, and economies.

As can be seen from the top panel of the chart above, there is a pattern to economists’ estimates. They aren’t entirely a random walk. Instead, economists–for extended periods of time–consistently over or underestimate  the strength of the–in this case–U.S. economy. We’ve just gone through one of those stretches of underestimating the strength of the economy, and it appears that the economy is transitioning to a period of better strength than economists are expecting. That says nothing about whether the economy is strengthening, just whether or not it’s beating economists’ consensus forecasts.

Next Friday, we will see the release of what will arguably be August’s biggest economic release, Nonfarm Payrolls. From July 2011 through February 2012, the number of jobs added exceeded what economists had forecast, so economists ratcheted up their forecasts until the number of jobs started coming up short, and from March 2012 through July 2012, the number of jobs created was less than expected; i.e. economists have been too optimistic, and that has to be getting old.

As a consequence–as of today–economists think that 100,000 jobs will have been added to the establishment payrolls. They will revise those estimates through next Thursday, and the consensus estimate will likely change after Wednesday, when ADP releases its Employment Change index.

I’ve talked to a number of folks who believe in aliens who believe that everything is a conspiracy, and the conspiracy du jour is that the figures are all bunk (I don’t necessarily disagree, per se, but they’ve been bunk because they’re faulty measures for some time) and the White House will pull out all stops to ensure its present resident gets to renew his lease on one Pennsylvania Avenue set of digs. So, combine that with chastened economists who want to get a forecast right–they’ve been on the wrong side (optimism) and need to get on the right side (currently, pessimism)–and you’ve got a recipe for a positive surprise in the Nonfarm Payrolls–August’s biggest release–which kicks off the second half rally that is typical of election years. I’m just guessing, not promising.

Graig P. Stettner, CFA, CMT

Chief Investment Officer

Tower Private Advisors

Share

Weekly Recap & Outlook – 02.25.11

Friday, February 25th, 2011

Tower Private Advisors

Below

  • Libya
  • Oil
  • Inflation protection, II

Prior Posts

(more…)

Share

Consumer Price Index (CPI) – maybe the “Con” part should be emphasized

Monday, January 3rd, 2011

‘Ever find yourself filling up the tank with petrol or wheeling the cart out of the grocery story, wondering how deflation could be a problem?  I do.

In November, the Consumer Price Index grew by 1.1% over 12 months.  Net of food and energy costs, the so-called Core CPI grew by just 0.8%.  That’s not what our budget at home reflects.  The reason why is in the way the government manipulates calculates inflation.  The following chart shows what the current CPI basket of component indexes looks like.

Note that housing comprises about 42% of the index, while Food & Beverages, Transportation, and Medical Care comprise just 38%.  Now, I’m not arguing that housing isn’t important, but once you’ve got a roof over your head, you could argue that the other three categories become more important.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics, however, says that homeowners could rent out their homes, and, therefore there needs to be some allowance for that.  Thus, was born, Owners Equivalent Rent, and it is fully 25% of CPI, as the chart below shows.

Here is a look at the November CPI and the basket components.

Economists are notorious for stripping economic series down to their cores.  Whatever their ostensible reasoning for doing so, the real reason is because the headline figures are harder to forecast than the core versions.  Since they do that, so can we.  So here is a look at the components amongst the CPI baskets that you and I would say are the essentials; they’re what we need to spend money on to live.  For the chart below, I’ve factored out the housing and recreation components.  This version looks more like our household; it would look even more like it if we factored out the prices of vehicles. 

And here is the resulting CPI from the Mr. Obvious Insights’ household CPI.  If we factored out vehicle prices–we haven’t bought one in seven years–our inflation picture–and, I’m guessing, yours–would look even worse (i.e. higher.)

That’s still not what we’d call runaway inflation, is it?  It is, however, almost twice the official statistic and more than twice the so-called Core rate of inflation, and it certainly doesn’t look inflation.

Does it matter?

It absolutely matters because it is the basis of government policies–namely the Federal Reserve.   The entire premise of quantitative easing–stated or not–is that we must not slip into deflation, as we don’t want to repeat the mistakes of the ’30s. 

2.29% is a whole lot more ‘flation than is 1.13%.

So if deflation isn’t a problem, then what is the Fed doing by quantitative easing?  Inflating bubbles, and like all of them, this one will end badly.  Candidates for bubblicious asset classes are:

  1. Emerging markets
  2. Commodities
  3. Others?
Share

Weekly Recap & Outlook – 10.15.10

Friday, October 15th, 2010

Tower Private Advisors

Below

  • Capital markets recap surprise
  • Earnings and quantitative easing
  • Small business optimism stinks

(more…)

Share

Markets setting up for hopes dashed

Monday, August 9th, 2010

If you haven’t heard by now, last Friday’s jobs report on U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls didn’t go over so well.  Naturally, the President saw hope in a portion of the release, but it took some seriously rose-colored glasses.

Here’s a quick recap:

  • Economists expected a drop of (-)65,000 jobs, because those sharp folks knew that census workers would begin to be furloughed/downsized/fired/canned, but they evidently expected a pick-up in private payrolls to offset that drop.
  • Instead, payrolls fell by (-)131,000.  What’s more, the June figure was revised downward, from an initial release of 125,000 jobs lost to 221,000 jobs lost.
  • The Private Payrolls increase, which seemed to be sparked by an optimistic ADP’s Employment Change report of Wednesday, which only reports on private payrolls, was 71,000 instead of the hoped-for 90,000.
  • The Unemployment Rate stayed at 9.5% instead of increasing to 9.6%.  The unemployment rate always goes up after a recession as the labor pool swells up as more job seekers re-enter the labor force.
  • On the positive side of the ledger, Average Hourly Earnings grew by 0.2%, far better than the drop of (-)0.1% in June, and the President found hope in the increase in Manufacturing Payrolls.  They rose by 36,000, 4x the June number and far more than the hoped for 13,000.

So how does one explain the market’s performance, shown below?  The market dropped shortly after the opening, and the opening nonsense is often reversed, but there was very little positive to be found in this most important of economic reports.  Indeed, at this point in the game, it is the most important report, bar none, whatever that means.

According to a couple of sources, it was rumored that the Federal Open Markets Committee; i.e. the Fed, which is to meet tomorrow, is prepared to announce another round of monetary policy measures meant to stimulate the economy.  So far, traditional monetary policy has amounted to pushing on a string, so the market is hoping for another round of Quantitative Easing–QE to the informed.  For those of you worried about the government printing money that’s what QE is.  In this case, they wouldn’t exactly be printing money, just reinvesting principal-paydown proceeds from Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) into . . . Treasuries or more MBS.

According to some of those same sources, those hopes are likely to be dashed.  As we like to say–and like most things, it’s not original to us–hope is not an investment strategy.  It is, however, a decent speculation strategy, so long as you can sell the idea (and your securities) to a greater fool.

If the Fed does not announce new measures, the market tanks.

Share