<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Recap &amp; Outlook &#8211; 08.14.09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.towerbank.net/weekly-recap/weekly-recap-outlook-081409/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.towerbank.net/weekly-recap/weekly-recap-outlook-081409/</link>
	<description>Obvious Insights with Graig Stettner of Tower Private Advisors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.towerbank.net/weekly-recap/weekly-recap-outlook-081409/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.towerbank.net/blog/?p=989#comment-339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re:  Steve Schwarzman &amp; John Paulson had you see these two stories:

http://realestate.msn.com/blogs/listedblogpost.aspx?post=1229160&amp;_blg=1,1229160

Shows that it&#039;s helpful to have friends at the Fed that one can lobby to rescue one from  bad derivative investments.  :)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6736074.ece

I&#039;ll never be convinced that when one takes a $30 mln hit on their one-of-a-kind &quot;baby&quot; that one doesn&#039;t &quot;need&quot; the money.  &quot;Need&quot; is relative.   And no, i don&#039;t buy that he broke even  renting &quot;the boat for more than £300,000 a week.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Steve Schwarzman &amp; John Paulson had you see these two stories:</p>
<p><a href="http://realestate.msn.com/blogs/listedblogpost.aspx?post=1229160&#038;_blg=1,1229160" rel="nofollow">http://realestate.msn.com/blogs/listedblogpost.aspx?post=1229160&#038;_blg=1,1229160</a></p>
<p>Shows that it&#8217;s helpful to have friends at the Fed that one can lobby to rescue one from  bad derivative investments.  <img src='http://blog.towerbank.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6736074.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6736074.ece</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll never be convinced that when one takes a $30 mln hit on their one-of-a-kind &#8220;baby&#8221; that one doesn&#8217;t &#8220;need&#8221; the money.  &#8220;Need&#8221; is relative.   And no, i don&#8217;t buy that he broke even  renting &#8220;the boat for more than £300,000 a week.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.towerbank.net/weekly-recap/weekly-recap-outlook-081409/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.towerbank.net/blog/?p=989#comment-338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer tracking the index LT &amp; the vehicle that is actually traded ST.  IOW, if index is down &amp; ETF is up i&#039;m all over the ETF long &amp; vice versa.

But in the case that we&#039;re discussing here it appears to be apples &amp; oranges ... worrisome.

This morning&#039;s opening kind of surprised me.  OTOH, the overnight &amp; pre-mkt action did not.  Yesterday&#039;s rally looked like the end of an abc 2nd wave with 3rd wave damage today.  However, we couldn&#039;t take out Monday&#039;s lows &amp; then stalled below yesterday&#039;s highs.  Smells like range trading thru Fri to me. 

Keep up the humor.  It&#039;s appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer tracking the index LT &amp; the vehicle that is actually traded ST.  IOW, if index is down &amp; ETF is up i&#8217;m all over the ETF long &amp; vice versa.</p>
<p>But in the case that we&#8217;re discussing here it appears to be apples &amp; oranges &#8230; worrisome.</p>
<p>This morning&#8217;s opening kind of surprised me.  OTOH, the overnight &amp; pre-mkt action did not.  Yesterday&#8217;s rally looked like the end of an abc 2nd wave with 3rd wave damage today.  However, we couldn&#8217;t take out Monday&#8217;s lows &amp; then stalled below yesterday&#8217;s highs.  Smells like range trading thru Fri to me. </p>
<p>Keep up the humor.  It&#8217;s appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graig Stettner</title>
		<link>http://blog.towerbank.net/weekly-recap/weekly-recap-outlook-081409/comment-page-1/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Graig Stettner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.towerbank.net/blog/?p=989#comment-337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a little non-confirmation in the semi index(es) and ETFs.  Like you, that would make me distrustful.  Also, like you, I&#039;ve wrestled with the issue of ETFs v. indexes, and I tend to side with the indexes.  Do you buy the breakout in the index or the ETF?  Seems like the index is the more important to watch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a little non-confirmation in the semi index(es) and ETFs.  Like you, that would make me distrustful.  Also, like you, I&#8217;ve wrestled with the issue of ETFs v. indexes, and I tend to side with the indexes.  Do you buy the breakout in the index or the ETF?  Seems like the index is the more important to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.towerbank.net/weekly-recap/weekly-recap-outlook-081409/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.towerbank.net/blog/?p=989#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graig, i tried emailing you (graig.stettner@towerbank.org)  the following Monday evening, but it wouldn&#039;t go thru.

Tongue-in-cheek humor to make a point is always appreciated by me.

New recommended portfolio position: fetal
 
Recession over [INSERT BOILERPLATE HERE] 
 
...although one of the frequent states of economists.  So if they weren’t confused, would they be plussed?
 
Librarian leanings.
 
Graig,
 
I&#039;m an ex-stkbrkr &amp; later an ex-member &amp; floor trader of a commodities exchange.  I&#039;m an active trader &amp; also manage some funds.  I just very recently discovered your blog via Google alerts &amp; have been worried since i didn&#039;t see any postings after July 31.  
 
Despite having some short &amp; put positions for near-term weakness i have been looking for a mini-blow off before a short-term decline in Sept/Oct.  We may still get that blow off.  However, now since mkt indices are so far below their 20Ema, i&#039;m using that as a stop to STAY short.
 
I just realized today that my canary-in-the-coal mines, my lead husky $SOX is out of sync with SMH, XSD, PSI, IGW, &amp; USD, vis-a-vis their June highs.
 
$SOX is indicating more weakness dropping below its June highs &amp; breakout.  SMH, XSD, PSI, IGW, USD, are all showing relatively more strength considerably above their June highs &amp; breakouts.
 
This makes me a little distrustful of the weakness indicated in $SOX.  I wonder if this difference betw $SOX &amp; the semi&#039;s ETFs is only due to composition of their holdings. If so which is a truer depiction of the sector ... $SOX or the ETFs ??
 
Graig, any thoughts ?
 
Regards,
dave]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graig, i tried emailing you (graig.stettner@towerbank.org)  the following Monday evening, but it wouldn&#8217;t go thru.</p>
<p>Tongue-in-cheek humor to make a point is always appreciated by me.</p>
<p>New recommended portfolio position: fetal</p>
<p>Recession over [INSERT BOILERPLATE HERE] </p>
<p>&#8230;although one of the frequent states of economists.  So if they weren’t confused, would they be plussed?</p>
<p>Librarian leanings.</p>
<p>Graig,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an ex-stkbrkr &amp; later an ex-member &amp; floor trader of a commodities exchange.  I&#8217;m an active trader &amp; also manage some funds.  I just very recently discovered your blog via Google alerts &amp; have been worried since i didn&#8217;t see any postings after July 31.  </p>
<p>Despite having some short &amp; put positions for near-term weakness i have been looking for a mini-blow off before a short-term decline in Sept/Oct.  We may still get that blow off.  However, now since mkt indices are so far below their 20Ema, i&#8217;m using that as a stop to STAY short.</p>
<p>I just realized today that my canary-in-the-coal mines, my lead husky $SOX is out of sync with SMH, XSD, PSI, IGW, &amp; USD, vis-a-vis their June highs.</p>
<p>$SOX is indicating more weakness dropping below its June highs &amp; breakout.  SMH, XSD, PSI, IGW, USD, are all showing relatively more strength considerably above their June highs &amp; breakouts.</p>
<p>This makes me a little distrustful of the weakness indicated in $SOX.  I wonder if this difference betw $SOX &amp; the semi&#8217;s ETFs is only due to composition of their holdings. If so which is a truer depiction of the sector &#8230; $SOX or the ETFs ??</p>
<p>Graig, any thoughts ?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
